Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S572Change ✕
Greater Access to Fertility Medication
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Natalie MurdockDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires health insurance plans that cover fertility treatments to remove annual and lifetime limits on ovulation medication and ovulation induction cycles, and to treat ovulation medication the same as other prescription drugs. It applies these same requirements to North Carolina's State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees, with funding allocated to cover increased costs.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill removes barriers to fertility treatment for North Carolinians struggling with infertility, making medication more affordable and accessible.
- •They contend that fertility medication should be treated like any other prescription drug, and that removing coverage limits helps people who want to start families without facing financial hardship or arbitrary insurance restrictions.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that this expands insurance coverage mandates, which could increase premiums for all plan members regardless of whether they use fertility services.
- •They may also question whether government should mandate specific coverage requirements for private insurers, and note that the state is appropriating significant funds ($300,000-$600,000 annually) to cover increased costs to the State Health Plan.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.