Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Limit Rules With Substantial Financial Costs
Primary Sponsor
Steve JarvisRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires state agency boards and commissions to obtain special approval votes before adopting expensive regulations. Rules projected to cost $1 million or more over five years require a two-thirds vote, while rules costing $10 million or more require unanimous approval (unless required by federal law, which only needs two-thirds approval). The bill also updates fiscal note requirements for agencies proposing rules with substantial economic impact.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill prevents agencies from imposing costly regulations without careful consideration and broad agreement.
- •They contend it ensures major financial burdens on businesses and individuals receive proper oversight, makes regulatory processes more transparent, and gives decision-makers time to weigh costs against benefits before implementing expensive rules.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue this bill could slow necessary public health, safety, and environmental protections by making it harder to adopt regulations that benefit the public even if they cost businesses money.
- •They contend unanimous or two-thirds vote requirements could allow a minority to block rules most members support, and that focusing only on costs ignores benefits (like pollution reduction or worker safety) that regulations provide.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.