Compare Bills

Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.

Cosmetic Art Deregulation

IntroducedSenate
Lisa GrafsteinDemocrat

Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26

No floor votes recorded.

This bill removes state licensing requirements for natural hair care services, blow-dry styling, and makeup artistry, allowing people to provide these services after completing a one-time four-hour sanitation course instead. It converts the mandatory natural hair care specialist license into a voluntary certification that is no longer required to practice. The bill also expands where these services can be provided, including in barbershops and other venues beyond traditional cosmetology shops.

  • Supporters argue this bill reduces barriers to entry for workers in these specific services, lowering costs and allowing more people to enter the profession without lengthy licensing requirements.
  • They contend that natural hair care, blow-dry styling, and makeup artistry are less risky services that don't require the same level of regulation as chemical-intensive services like perms or hair coloring.
  • The bill may increase job opportunities and entrepreneurship, particularly benefiting communities underserved by licensed cosmetology shops.
  • Opponents worry that removing licensing requirements may compromise consumer safety and product quality standards, as unlicensed practitioners won't have formal training on sanitation, chemistry, or professional standards beyond a four-hour course.
  • They argue that licensing protects consumers by ensuring practitioners meet minimum competency standards and can be held accountable through disciplinary processes.
  • Some may be concerned about fair competition between newly unlicensed practitioners and those who completed expensive licensed training programs.

Search for a bill to compare

Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.