Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S637Change ✕
Ensure Same-Sex Domestic Violence Prot. Order
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Lisa GrafsteinDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-03-26
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill modifies North Carolina's domestic violence protective order law to ensure that same-sex couples have the same access to protective orders as opposite-sex couples. Currently, the law limits dating relationship protections to opposite-sex couples; this bill removes that gender restriction so same-sex couples can obtain protective orders in dating relationships.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill ensures equal protection under law by closing a gap that leaves same-sex couples vulnerable to domestic violence without legal recourse.
- •They contend that domestic violence protection should be available to all North Carolinians regardless of sexual orientation, and that removing the opposite-sex requirement brings the state in line with constitutional protections and modern fairness standards.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue about the scope of legislative changes to family law definitions or express concerns about how courts will implement expanded definitions.
- •Some may question whether this represents an appropriate level of state involvement in relationship definitions, though most legal experts view the protective order statute as a straightforward expansion of existing domestic violence protections.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.