Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H537Change ✕
Alena's Law & Office of Vital Records Changes
PassedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Dudley GreeneRepublicanLast Action
Ch. SL 2025-442025-07-01
Vote Breakdown
108 Yea0 Nay2025-06-24
Plain Language Summary
This bill makes three main changes: (1) it creates a legal presumption that someone has died if they disappeared and remained missing for at least 90 days during a declared disaster; (2) it requires the Office of Vital Records to process birth and death certificate amendments within 30 days; and (3) it prohibits Office of Vital Records employees from working remotely except during declared emergencies.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue the disaster presumption of death helps families and insurers resolve estates and benefits more quickly after disasters when many people are missing.
- •The 30-day processing deadline improves government efficiency and reduces wait times for vital records amendments that people need for legal and administrative purposes.
- •The telework restriction ensures in-person staff availability at vital records offices to meet the new processing deadline.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that presuming death after only 90 days during a disaster could be premature in some cases and create legal complications if someone is later found alive.
- •The telework restriction limits employee flexibility and work-life balance options, and may be difficult to enforce fairly across different circumstances.
- •Critics might also question whether restricting telework is the most effective way to meet processing deadlines, rather than addressing staffing or resource levels directly.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.