Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H558Change ✕
Criteria for PHP Contract Procurement
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Larry PottsRepublicanLast Action
Serial Referral To Finance Stricken2025-04-15
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill updates how North Carolina's Medicaid program selects health insurance companies to serve Medicaid recipients. For future contract renewals, it limits statewide contracts to no more than four companies and gives preference to certain types of bidders—particularly Provider-Led Entities (PLEs) and companies with higher provider satisfaction ratings.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill improves Medicaid administration by prioritizing companies with proven track records of good relationships with doctors and healthcare providers.
- •By favoring PLEs (organizations led by healthcare providers themselves) and providers with higher satisfaction scores, the state may get better quality care coordination and patient outcomes.
- •This approach could also reduce administrative turnover and disruption in coverage.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may contend that giving preference to specific bidder types could limit competition and raise costs for the state's Medicaid program.
- •They might argue that the preference criteria could exclude potentially qualified companies and that open competitive bidding based purely on cost and capability would better serve taxpayers and beneficiaries.
- •There are also questions about whether provider satisfaction scores are the best measure of plan quality and patient care outcomes.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.