Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-07

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill makes two main changes: First, it extends the statute of limitations for malpractice lawsuits related to gender transition services to 10 years after a patient turns 18, and prohibits medical professionals from having patients waive liability for such services. Second, it restricts the use of state funds for gender transition procedures, puberty-blocking drugs, and cross-sex hormones for minors and prisoners, with an exception for treating medical complications from previously performed procedures.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects minors by allowing them a longer time window to pursue legal action if they experience harm from gender transition treatments, and ensures they cannot be required to sign away their legal rights.
• •They contend that restricting state funding for these procedures reflects public policy concerns about medical interventions for minors and represents responsible use of taxpayer money.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents contend that extending the statute of limitations and removing liability waivers may increase litigation costs and discourage medical professionals from providing care.
• •They argue that the funding restrictions limit access to medical treatments that some consider medically appropriate, may conflict with federal law or healthcare standards, and could prevent individuals in state custody from accessing treatments they desire.