Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Law Enforcement/Destroy Certain Firearms
Primary Sponsor
Marcia MoreyDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-01
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows North Carolina law enforcement agencies to destroy certain firearms in their possession, including unclaimed guns, firearms confiscated after convictions for certain crimes, and firearms purchased through or voluntarily surrendered to gun buy-back programs. Currently, state law prohibits police from destroying most seized firearms, leading to large storage backlogs costing departments significant money and creating safety risks.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that police departments are storing over 74,000 seized firearms at considerable expense, creating risks of theft, accidental discharge, and injury.
- •They contend that most departments do not want to resell these guns because they fear the weapons will be used in future crimes.
- •This bill would allow destruction of firearms that have no legible identification numbers, are unsafe, or are unclaimed after a reasonable period, freeing up storage space and reducing costs while allowing legitimate owners to recover their property.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may express concerns that destroying firearms limits law enforcement's ability to use them as evidence in future cases or maintain them for legitimate purposes like training.
- •Some may worry about the standards for determining whether a gun is "unsafe" or whether adequate efforts have been made to locate rightful owners.
- •Additionally, concerns could be raised about the loss of potential revenue from selling firearms to licensed dealers, which currently funds public schools under existing law.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.