Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Limit Excessive Mag Sizes
Primary Sponsor
Marcia MoreyDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-02
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill would prohibit the manufacture, sale, purchase, transfer, and possession of large-capacity ammunition magazines in North Carolina, defined as magazines holding more than 10 rounds for most firearms or more than 8 shotgun shells. Violations would be Class 2 misdemeanors, with enhanced penalties for repeat offenses or use during felonies. The law includes exceptions for military and law enforcement, out-of-state transfers, and allows current owners 180 days to modify, surrender, or sell their magazines.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that limiting magazine capacity reduces the number of rounds a shooter can fire without reloading, potentially limiting casualties during mass shooting events and giving victims or responders more time to respond.
- •They point to other states' magazine restrictions as a reasonable public safety measure that preserves gun ownership while addressing a specific concern about rapid-fire capability.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue that magazine restrictions infringe on Second Amendment rights and do little to prevent crime since criminals can carry multiple magazines or obtain them illegally.
- •They contend that law-abiding citizens should not face criminal penalties for lawfully-owned property and question the effectiveness of the measure given that magazine changes take only seconds, potentially making minimal practical difference in violent scenarios.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.