Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H618Change ✕
Ivermectin Access Act
EngrossedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Jeff ZengerRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-07
Vote Breakdown
42 Yea69 Nay2025-05-07
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires North Carolina's State Health Director to issue a statewide standing order allowing pharmacists to dispense ivermectin to customers without a prescription or consultation with a healthcare provider. The bill also provides legal immunity from civil and criminal liability for the State Health Director and any pharmacist who dispenses ivermectin under this standing order.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill increases access to ivermectin, which they believe is an effective treatment for certain conditions and parasitic infections.
- •They contend that removing the prescription requirement reduces barriers to treatment, allows patients more autonomy in healthcare decisions, and gives pharmacists expanded roles in disease prevention and treatment.
- •Proponents may also argue the immunity provisions protect healthcare workers from legal consequences for providing what they consider beneficial care.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents raise concerns that dispensing ivermectin without medical oversight could lead to inappropriate use, incorrect dosing, or dangerous drug interactions that a healthcare provider would normally catch.
- •Critics worry the bill bypasses established medical review processes and may enable use of ivermectin for conditions where its effectiveness is unproven or disputed, potentially wasting resources or causing harm.
- •They also argue that broad immunity provisions could discourage accountability and proper medical practice standards.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.