Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Transportation for the Future Act
Primary Sponsor
Gloristine BrownDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-02
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill modernizes North Carolina's transportation funding distribution formula by increasing support for non-highway transportation projects like public transit, rail, and bicycle/pedestrian infrastructure. It reallocates state transportation funds from 40% to 30% for statewide highway projects, increases regional projects from 30% to 40%, and requires at least 20% of funds go to non-highway projects. It also updates local zoning and subdivision regulations to better accommodate multimodal transportation planning.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill makes transportation spending more efficient by investing in diverse transportation modes that reduce congestion and pollution.
- •They contend it gives communities flexibility to build sustainable transit systems like bus rapid transit and light rail that serve regional needs, supports economic development in underserved areas, and modernizes outdated regulations to enable walkable communities with better access to jobs and services.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue the bill reduces funding certainty for traditional highway projects that serve rural areas and commuters, potentially delaying road maintenance and expansion projects.
- •They contend the increased complexity of evaluating non-highway projects may slow decision-making, that transit projects require local matching funds communities may not afford, and that the reallocation could disadvantage less densely-populated regions that depend on highways rather than public transit.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.