Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-06-16

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill establishes statewide minimum standards of care for companion animals (dogs and cats), including adequate food, water, shelter, exercise, space, and veterinary treatment. It creates criminal penalties for violations and allows local governments to adopt equal or stricter standards, while providing $10,000 for public education about these requirements.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects animals from neglect and abuse by setting clear, enforceable standards that prevent suffering.
• •They contend that comprehensive definitions of adequate care—including shelter requirements, tether length minimums, and veterinary treatment—will help law enforcement address animal cruelty more effectively.
• •The bill balances animal welfare with practical exceptions for hunting dogs, working dogs, and farm animals.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue the bill creates vague standards that are difficult to enforce consistently, potentially leading to arbitrary or inconsistent prosecution.
• •Some express concern that the detailed regulations could burden pet owners with compliance costs or create liability for minor infractions.
• •Others contend that existing animal cruelty laws are sufficient and that local communities should decide their own animal care standards without state-level mandates.