Compare Bills

Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.

Adjust FMAP Trigger for Medicaid Expansion

IntroducedHouse

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-02

No floor votes recorded.

This bill lowers the threshold that would trigger the end of Medicaid expansion coverage in North Carolina. Currently, expansion coverage would only stop if federal funding fell below 90% of the non-expansion Medicaid rate; this bill changes that threshold (the specific new percentage is referenced in existing law but not stated in this excerpt). The bill requires the state to notify lawmakers and begin the discontinuation process if this lower threshold is reached.

  • Supporters argue this bill provides budget certainty and fiscal responsibility by establishing a trigger point that better protects state finances if federal Medicaid funding decreases.
  • They contend that lowering the threshold helps the state plan ahead and avoid sudden budget crises, ensuring sustainable Medicaid operations without unexpected costs to taxpayers.
  • Opponents argue this bill could result in coverage loss for vulnerable North Carolinians who depend on Medicaid expansion, potentially leaving thousands without health insurance.
  • They contend that lowering the discontinuation threshold makes it more likely the state will end expansion coverage, prioritizing budget concerns over healthcare access for low-income residents.

Search for a bill to compare

Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.