Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H666Change ✕
Wildlife Resources Commission Term Limits
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Ben MossRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill changes the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission so that all members serve two-year terms instead of the current mix of two, four, and six-year terms. It also limits Commission members to a maximum of three consecutive two-year terms (six years total), though current members are allowed to complete their existing terms.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that shorter, uniform term lengths increase accountability and allow the Governor and General Assembly to refresh Commission membership more frequently with new perspectives and policies.
- •They contend that the three-term limit prevents any single member from accumulating excessive influence while still allowing experienced leaders to serve a meaningful tenure.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that shortening terms from six years to two years reduces institutional continuity and expertise on wildlife management issues that require long-term knowledge.
- •They could also contend that more frequent turnover creates additional administrative burden in recruiting and training new members, potentially disrupting the Commission's ability to implement long-term conservation strategies.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.