Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H651Change ✕
Reduce Parent Copays/Child Care Subsidy/Funds
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Lindsey PratherDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-02
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill reduces the percentage of gross family income that parents must pay as copayments for state-subsidized child care from 10% to 7%. It appropriates $25 million annually for the 2025-2027 fiscal years to fund this reduction in parent costs.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill makes child care more affordable for working families, particularly low- and middle-income households, reducing a major barrier to employment and economic stability.
- •They contend that lower copayments help parents access quality early education and child development services while keeping more money in family budgets for other necessities.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the $25 million annual appropriation strains the state budget during a time of competing priorities, or that the funds could be used for other education or social programs.
- •Some may question whether a 3-percentage-point reduction sufficiently addresses affordability concerns or whether alternative approaches to child care assistance would be more effective.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.