Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Open Movie Captioning in Movie Theaters
Primary Sponsor
Jordan LopezDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires movie theaters in North Carolina with more than 10 weekly showings to provide open captioning (on-screen text display of dialogue and sound descriptions) for at least one-fourth of showings for movies that play four or more times per week, with a maximum of four captioned showings required per movie per week. Theaters must advertise captioned showings and maintain compliance records, with violations subject to civil penalties of $100-$500.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill improves accessibility for deaf and hard-of-hearing moviegoers, as well as those with auditory processing difficulties or in noisy environments, allowing them equal access to entertainment.
- •They contend that open captioning is a reasonable accommodation that benefits viewers without significantly burdening theater operations, since only a fraction of weekly showings are required to have captions and many movies are already captioned.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents raise concerns that open captioning requirements could reduce profits for smaller and mid-sized theaters already facing financial pressure, as captioning setup has technical costs and some moviegoers prefer uncaptioned showings.
- •They argue that existing closed captioning devices (headsets) serve deaf and hard-of-hearing patrons without requiring changes to all theatrical presentations, and question whether state mandates on private businesses are appropriate rather than voluntary industry standards.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.