Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Study CTE Licensure Requirements
Primary Sponsor
David WillisRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-03
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill directs the Department of Public Instruction, working with the State Board of Community Colleges, to study whether skilled workers and professionals with real-world experience could become Career and Technical Education (CTE) high school teachers without meeting all current licensure requirements. The study must be completed by March 15, 2026, and recommend alternative or modified paths to CTE teacher licensure based on industry credentials and work experience.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this study could address teacher shortages in CTE programs by opening the profession to experienced tradespeople and professionals who have deep expertise in their fields but lack traditional teaching credentials.
- •They contend that skilled workers with years of industry experience may be effective teachers without completing all standard licensure requirements, potentially bringing more practical, real-world knowledge to students preparing for technical careers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may be concerned that lowering or modifying licensure requirements could compromise teaching quality if candidates lack formal training in pedagogy, classroom management, and educational standards.
- •They might also worry about protecting existing teacher professionals and question whether industry experience alone ensures someone can effectively teach diverse groups of high school students.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.