Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H761Change ✕
Limit Session Length
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Harry WarrenRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-07
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would limit how long the North Carolina General Assembly can meet in regular session: 90 legislative days in odd-numbered years and 45 legislative days in even-numbered years. The amendment would be submitted to voters in November 2026, and if approved, would take effect for future legislative sessions.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that session limits encourage legislative efficiency and prevent unnecessary spending on extended sessions.
- •They contend that shorter sessions force lawmakers to prioritize important bills and reduce the time available for controversial or low-priority legislation, allowing representatives to spend more time in their districts working with constituents.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry that strict session limits could prevent the General Assembly from adequately addressing complex state issues like budget negotiations, education policy, and emergency situations that require thorough debate and deliberation.
- •They argue that artificially short sessions may give advantage to special interests and lobbyists who can focus resources, while disadvantaging individual citizens and good-government advocates who need time to meaningfully participate.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.