Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Modernize NC S.A.F.E. Act/2d Mortgage Fee Act
Primary Sponsor
Mitchell SetzerRepublicanLast Action
Ch. SL 2025-432025-07-01
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill modernizes North Carolina's mortgage lending laws by updating definitions, requirements, and procedures in the state's S.A.F.E. Mortgage Licensing Act, and modifies the maximum fees lenders can charge on second or junior mortgage loans to align with federal qualified mortgage standards. The changes include streamlining licensing procedures, clarifying regulatory authority, and allowing slightly higher fee caps on certain junior lien loans while maintaining consumer protections.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill brings North Carolina's mortgage regulations into alignment with federal standards, reducing compliance confusion for lenders operating across multiple states.
- •The increased fee allowances on junior lien loans may make credit more accessible to borrowers who need second mortgages, and modernizing the licensing system improves efficiency.
- •Updated definitions and procedures clarify rules for regulators and the industry, potentially reducing unnecessary regulatory burden while maintaining consumer safeguards.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents contend that allowing higher fees on junior lien loans (up to 3% in some cases) could increase borrowing costs for consumers, particularly lower-income households seeking second mortgages.
- •The expanded regulatory authority and examination powers granted to the Commissioner may create additional compliance costs.
- •Critics also worry that broader fee allowances could enable predatory lending practices on more vulnerable borrowers seeking home equity loans or refinancing options.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.