Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
No Retaliation Against Mandatory Reporters
Primary Sponsor
Julia GreenfieldDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-09
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill protects employees who are legally required to report suspected abuse, neglect, fraud, or other threats to vulnerable persons from being fired, demoted, or otherwise punished by their employers for making those reports. It allows employees to file complaints with the North Carolina Commissioner of Labor and pursue legal action if they face retaliation, with potential remedies including reinstatement, back pay, and civil penalties up to $5,000.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill removes a significant barrier to mandatory reporting by ensuring that employees won't face job loss or other workplace consequences for following the law.
- •They contend that mandatory reporters—including teachers, healthcare workers, and social workers—need legal protection to do their jobs effectively and protect vulnerable children, disabled adults, and seniors without fear of employer retaliation.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill could expose employers to increased litigation and administrative costs, potentially making employers liable even when they have legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons for employment decisions.
- •Some business groups might contend that the law creates uncertainty in employment relationships and could make it harder for employers to manage performance issues, or that existing whistleblower laws already provide adequate protection.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.