Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H830Change ✕
The Rolling Ink Act
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Jonathan AlmondRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref to the Com on Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-28
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill allows mobile tattoo parlors to operate in North Carolina vehicles, provided they meet specific health and safety requirements. The bill establishes a permitting process, facility standards (including sterilization equipment and waste management systems), operational restrictions, and enforcement penalties for violations.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill expands access to tattoo services for people in rural or underserved areas where fixed-location parlors may be unavailable or inconvenient.
- •The bill includes comprehensive health and safety requirements—such as sterilization equipment, bloodborne pathogen standards, and regular inspections—to protect public health while allowing entrepreneurs to operate mobile businesses and generate economic activity.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may be concerned about the difficulty of maintaining consistent sanitation standards in a moving vehicle and the challenges for health departments in monitoring compliance across multiple mobile locations.
- •Some may worry that the $5,000 initial permit fee and $2,500 annual renewal fees could be burdensome for small business owners, and they may question whether mobile operations can adequately meet all the same standards as stationary facilities.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.