Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-10

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill establishes a statewide leashing law for dogs and creates strict liability for dog owners when their unleashed dogs injure people or other animals in public. It defines 'at large' to include dogs not under reasonable physical control, such as those off-leash, on overly long leashes, or escaped from enclosures, and makes violations a Class 3 misdemeanor.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects public safety by creating consistent statewide protections rather than varying local rules that confuse enforcement and legal action.
• •They contend it helps dog bite victims by establishing clear liability standards and making it easier for police, animal control, and lawyers to pursue cases, while also reducing conflicts between on-leash and off-leash dogs in public spaces.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue the bill's broad definition of 'at large' could penalize responsible dog owners in unforeseeable situations like escaped pets, and that statewide rules override local communities' ability to set policies suited to their specific needs.
• •They might also express concern about the strict liability standard, which holds owners responsible regardless of intent or the dog's history.