Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H920Change ✕
Virtual Currency Kiosk Consumer Prot. Act
EngrossedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Brian BiggsRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref to Finance. If fav, re-ref to Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-06-24
Vote Breakdown
48 Yea64 Nay2026-06-09
Plain Language Summary
This bill creates a new regulatory framework for virtual currency kiosks in North Carolina. It requires kiosk operators to be licensed as money transmitters, implement consumer protections like fraud warnings and transaction limits, provide detailed disclosures about risks, and comply with oversight by the Commissioner of Banks.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects North Carolina consumers from cryptocurrency scams, which have cost victims billions nationally.
- •The bill requires operators to display prominent fraud warnings, impose daily spending limits ($2,000 for new customers, $5,000 for existing), implement 48-hour holds on new accounts, and provide refunds for confirmed fraud.
- •These safeguards aim to prevent vulnerable people from being tricked into sending irreversible payments to scammers posing as banks, government agencies, or romantic interests.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the regulations create significant compliance costs and administrative burdens that could reduce kiosk availability or increase transaction fees for consumers.
- •The 14% fee cap, detailed disclosure requirements, mandatory compliance officers, blockchain analytics requirements, and frequent reporting obligations could make it difficult for smaller operators to remain profitable.
- •Critics might also contend that crypto transactions should face less regulation since users can verify transactions themselves, and that some protections (like 48-hour holds) inconvenience legitimate users.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.