Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H925Change ✕
Consumers in Crisis Protection Act
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Chris HumphreyRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-06-23
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill creates a new law regulating consumer legal funding companies in North Carolina. These companies provide upfront cash to people involved in lawsuits by buying a portion of their future settlement or judgment proceeds. The law sets rules for contracts, charges, disclosure requirements, and prohibits certain practices to protect consumers.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill helps people in financial crisis who are waiting for lawsuit settlements by providing immediate access to funds for living expenses and emergencies.
- •The law protects consumers through strict contract requirements, clear disclosures, limits on charges (capped at 25% of recovery), and a 10-day rescission period.
- •Supporters also point out that companies cannot influence legal decisions, charge hidden fees, or make improper payments to attorneys.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the law creates a new lending product that could encourage frivolous lawsuits or lead to consumer debt traps, particularly if people don't understand the terms.
- •Some may contend that limiting companies' ability to sell contracts or collect fees reduces business flexibility and could increase costs for consumers.
- •Others might question whether the registration and enforcement mechanisms are sufficient, or worry that the law's restrictions could reduce the availability of funding for people who need it.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.