Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
North Carolina Consumer Protection Act
Primary Sponsor
Maria CervaniaDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-14
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill prohibits North Carolina public utilities from recovering certain costs through customer rates, including advertising, lobbying, political contributions, and executive travel expenses. It requires utilities to submit annual reports detailing prohibited expenses and establishes penalties of $50,000 to $150,000 per violation, with collected penalties funding an Energy Equity Fund for disaster relief and low-income energy assistance programs.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects ratepayers from subsidizing utility company political activities and lobbying efforts that may not serve customers' interests.
- •They contend that customers should not pay for corporate advertising, political contributions, or litigation expenses, allowing utilities to recover only legitimate operational costs.
- •Proponents also highlight that penalty revenues can fund energy assistance for low-income households.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill's broad definitions of prohibited activities could limit utilities' ability to communicate with regulators on important service matters or participate in industry discussions necessary for grid reliability.
- •They contend that strict cost separation requirements increase administrative burdens and compliance costs, potentially affecting service quality or rates.
- •Critics may also question whether penalties are excessive relative to potential violations.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.