Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Keeping Our Coaches Act
Primary Sponsor
Eric AgerDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-14
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill directs $11 million annually from sports betting tax revenue to the Department of Public Instruction to provide salary supplements to public school athletic coaches, ensuring each eligible coach receives at least $3,000 total in state and non-state funds. Schools that previously provided non-state funds for coach supplements must continue doing so, and any unused funds go to support youth sports programming through the North Carolina Alliance of YMCAs.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses coach compensation challenges by guaranteeing a baseline salary supplement of $3,000, which can help recruit and retain quality coaches in public schools.
- •They contend that using sports betting revenue for this purpose creates a dedicated funding stream without raising taxes, and that better-compensated coaches improve athletic programs and student experiences.
- •The bill also encourages schools to maintain their existing financial commitments to coaching salaries.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that $11 million may be insufficient to meaningfully impact coach compensation across all public schools statewide, or that the money would be better directed to other educational priorities like classroom instruction.
- •Some may question whether relying on sports betting revenue for essential school programs is sustainable or appropriate, and express concerns about schools potentially reducing non-state funding contributions while depending on the state allocation.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.