Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2025-05-08

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill requires members of the North Carolina General Assembly to certify that they have reviewed the U.S. Constitution and North Carolina Constitution within the two years before taking office. The certification would be submitted to the Principal Clerk of their respective house and does not change the oath itself, only adds a documentation requirement.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill ensures legislators are familiar with the foundational documents they swear to uphold and defend.
• •They contend that certification creates accountability and demonstrates a basic level of preparation for the responsibility of making laws.
• •Proponents may view this as a reasonable way to reinforce the importance of constitutional knowledge among elected officials.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue the bill is symbolic rather than substantive, since it does not prevent anyone from taking office regardless of certification status.
• •Critics could question whether a certification requirement is an effective way to ensure genuine constitutional understanding, and some may view it as an unnecessary administrative burden without clear enforcement mechanisms or consequences for non-compliance.