Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H999Change ✕
Regulation of Video Gaming Terminals
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Harry WarrenRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-14
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill authorizes and creates a regulated system for video gaming terminals in North Carolina. It establishes licensing requirements for manufacturers, operators, and merchants; sets up a central monitoring system; allocates revenues between the state, operators, and merchants; and creates criminal penalties for unauthorized gaming machines.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill generates substantial state revenue—32% of net machine revenues go to a Video Gaming Fund and 8% covers enforcement and educational grants to historically Black universities.
- •The bill includes strong consumer protections like age restrictions (21+), mandatory surveillance, distance requirements from schools and churches, and a voluntary exclusion program for problem gamblers.
- •It creates jobs and tax revenue while establishing clear regulatory oversight through the Lottery Commission.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents contend the bill expands gambling in the state, potentially increasing problem gambling and associated social harms despite the voluntary exclusion program and responsible gaming materials.
- •Critics worry about the concentration of benefit to operators and merchants (60% of revenues combined), question whether regulatory oversight will be adequate given the bill's complexity, and note that advertising restrictions may limit consumer awareness of responsible gaming resources.
- •Some also express concern about the $14 million initial borrowing needed to implement the system.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.