Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H1008Change ✕
Stalking/Enhanced Penalties
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Amber BakerDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2025-04-16
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill increases criminal penalties for sexual battery and stalking when the perpetrator is a local government elected official and the victim is a fellow board member or subordinate employee. Sexual battery in these circumstances would be elevated from a Class A1 misdemeanor to a Class H felony, and stalking would be elevated to a Class H felony under these specific conditions.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that elected officials have positions of power and trust that they can abuse, making enhanced penalties necessary to protect vulnerable board members and employees from harassment.
- •They contend that stronger consequences deter abuse of authority and send a clear message that misconduct by public officials will face serious consequences.
- •Advocates view this as protecting the integrity of local government and ensuring safe workplaces for public servants.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the bill creates different penalty standards for the same conduct based on the defendant's employment status, raising questions about equal protection under the law.
- •They might express concern that felony charges for stalking or sexual battery only in government contexts could be seen as targeting a specific class of people rather than addressing the underlying offenses uniformly.
- •Some may also question whether existing penalties are already adequate without additional enhancements.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.