Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Address Confidentiality/Study & DL
Primary Sponsor
Thomas McInnisRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-06-23
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill creates a task force to study how to protect military personnel, special operations forces, elected officials, and others from doxing and swatting by removing or shielding their personal information from public records. It also immediately allows special operations force members to obtain driver's licenses and identification cards with substitute addresses instead of their home addresses.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects the safety and privacy of special operations personnel and their families, who face heightened risks of harassment, threats, and dangerous swatting incidents due to their military roles.
- •They contend that substitute driver's licenses and expanded address confidentiality programs are reasonable security measures that maintain public safety while allowing these individuals to function in society without exposing their home locations.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may worry that shielding personal information from public records could hinder government transparency and accountability, create administrative complexity across multiple agencies, or be misused by individuals falsely claiming special operations status.
- •They might also question whether the substitute address system adequately serves the needs of law enforcement, emergency responders, and election officials who need accurate address information to perform their duties.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.