Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Annex Various Military Property/Jacksonville
Primary Sponsor
Michael LazzaraRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-06-09
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill would expand the City of Jacksonville's boundaries to include certain portions of Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Marine Corps Air Station New River, and Marine Corps Special Operations Command at Stones Bay. The annexation would make these federal military properties subject to Jacksonville's municipal taxes starting July 1, 2026, though the bill specifies that Jacksonville cannot regulate or control military operations on these bases.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this annexation would increase tax revenue for Jacksonville to fund city services and infrastructure that benefit the military community and surrounding areas.
- •Proponents may contend that extending municipal boundaries aligns with the city's growth and allows Jacksonville to better serve and coordinate with the military installations that are central to the region's economy and population.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that taxing federal military property raises constitutional and practical concerns about the federal government's immunity from state and local taxation.
- •Critics could also worry that the annexation creates administrative complexity without giving Jacksonville actual regulatory authority over the bases, potentially creating confusion about jurisdiction and responsibility.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.