Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Const Amend: No Budget No Pay
Primary Sponsor
Maria CervaniaDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-04-23
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would require North Carolina voters to approve a measure preventing state legislators from receiving their salary and allowances after June 30 if the General Assembly has not passed a comprehensive budget for the upcoming fiscal year. The forfeiture would continue until either a budget is ratified or the legislative session ends, whichever comes first. Voters would decide on this amendment at the November 2026 general election.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this creates financial incentive for legislators to pass a budget on time, promoting fiscal discipline and preventing delays that can disrupt state operations.
- •They contend that if regular workers must meet deadlines to receive paychecks, elected officials should face similar accountability.
- •Proponents believe this mechanism encourages cooperation across party lines to complete essential budget work before the fiscal year begins.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents worry this could pressure legislators into approving poorly-crafted budgets just to meet the deadline and restore their pay, potentially leading to hasty fiscal decisions.
- •They argue it may disproportionately harm lower-paid legislative staff and create unequal hardship since wealthier lawmakers could absorb lost income more easily.
- •Critics also note that budget delays often stem from legitimate policy disagreements that shouldn't be resolved by financial coercion, and the measure could make legislative service less accessible to working-class candidates.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.