Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
AG Investigations/Certain ICE & CBP Incidents
Primary Sponsor
Phil RubinDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-04-28
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires North Carolina's Attorney General to investigate incidents involving federal immigration enforcement (ICE and CBP officers) that result in serious bodily injury or death. The Attorney General must publicly release findings and recommendations within seven days and report to legislative leaders. The bill allocates $450,000 in funding for the 2026-2027 fiscal year to implement these investigations.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill provides needed oversight and accountability for federal immigration enforcement actions that cause serious harm to North Carolinians.
- •They contend that independent state investigation and public reporting will ensure transparency, protect civil rights, and help identify whether enforcement officers acted appropriately or violated laws.
- •Proponents believe citizens have a right to know what happened in these incidents and that public findings can improve federal agency practices.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue this bill duplicates federal oversight mechanisms already in place, as federal agencies and the U.S.
- •Department of Justice have existing authority to investigate their own personnel.
- •They may contend that state investigations into federal officers' conduct could create conflicts with federal authority and complicate immigration enforcement operations.
- •Critics might also question whether the $450,000 funding is the most efficient use of state resources when federal agencies are already responsible for investigating their employees.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.