Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Public Safety Reinvestment Act
Primary Sponsor
Robert ReivesDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-04-29
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill appropriates approximately $371 million to improve public safety operations across North Carolina by: equipping public transit with emergency trauma kits and implementing fare enforcement measures ($10 million); hiring additional court staff in Wake and Mecklenburg counties ($60 million); providing salary increases for Department of Adult Correction employees ($250 million); raising State Highway Patrol pay ($40 million); funding juvenile justice staffing ($25 million); supporting the State Crime Lab ($4 million); and enhancing retirement benefits for correctional officers ($11 million).
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses critical workforce shortages in law enforcement, corrections, and courts that have compromised public safety.
- •By investing in competitive salaries and staffing, the state can attract and retain qualified personnel, reduce dangerous understaffing in correctional facilities, speed up court case processing, and improve response times.
- •The bill also enhances emergency capabilities on public transit and provides much-needed support to juvenile justice and forensic services, all of which supporters contend will strengthen accountability and reduce crime.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill represents a significant recurring spending commitment ($371 million annually) during uncertain fiscal times, potentially limiting flexibility for other state priorities.
- •Some question whether salary increases alone solve systemic problems without broader reforms, and whether the fairness of focused investments in only two counties for court staffing.
- •Others may express concerns about the public transit fare enforcement provisions, questioning whether stricter enforcement disproportionately affects lower-income riders or whether it diverts resources from service improvements.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.