Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-04-30

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill adds enforcement tools for the Consumer Protection Division of the Attorney General's Office to address cable service complaints. It allows the state to pursue civil actions to recover revenue from cable providers who commit repeat violations of federal customer service requirements or their own customer agreements, and requires cable companies to include complaint resolution information on customer bills.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill protects consumers by giving the state stronger enforcement powers against cable companies that repeatedly violate service standards.
• •The bill creates accountability for providers who ignore customer complaints and provides a remedy (revenue forfeiture) that discourages continued violations.
• •Proponents view this as necessary because cable service monopolies in many areas leave consumers with limited options.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue that the revenue forfeiture provision could increase costs for cable companies, which might be passed on to consumers through higher bills.
• •Some contend that existing complaint mechanisms are sufficient and that the bill creates additional regulatory burden without clear evidence that current enforcement is inadequate.
• •Cable providers might also object that the bill's language defining "repeat violations" could be interpreted broadly.