Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S912Change ✕
Menopause Omnibus
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Natalie MurdockDemocratLast Action
Re-ref Com On Appropriations/Base Budget2026-04-30
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill establishes a comprehensive framework to address menopause in North Carolina through four main components: funding menopause research and education, providing tax incentives for doctors to take menopause training, requiring health insurance and Medicaid to cover menopause-related care without cost-sharing, and protecting workers from discrimination based on menopause-related conditions.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses a significant gap in healthcare and workplace protections affecting roughly half the population during their working years.
- •They contend the bill improves medical knowledge about menopause, ensures access to treatment options (hormonal and non-hormonal), and protects workers experiencing menopause symptoms from discrimination and lack of reasonable accommodations.
- •Proponents also highlight that the bill includes protections for underserved populations and requires insurers to offer coverage without restrictive barriers.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill imposes significant costs on the state ($5 million for research and $500,000 for implementation) and on insurers through mandatory coverage expansions without cost-sharing that could increase insurance premiums.
- •Some may contend the employment protections are overly broad or create administrative burdens for small employers, or that certain menopause treatments lack sufficient clinical evidence.
- •Critics might also question whether some provisions duplicate existing protections under disability or sex discrimination laws.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.