Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Cape Fear IBT Moratorium/EMC IBT Reductions
Primary Sponsor
Robert DavisRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Agriculture and Environment, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill pauses new water transfers out of the upper Cape Fear River Basin until 2030 while a comprehensive study is conducted to assess the basin's water supply sustainability. It also expands the Environmental Management Commission's authority to reduce existing water transfers between river basins if necessary to protect water resources.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that the Cape Fear region has experienced significant growth and environmental changes since water transfer laws were last updated over 30 years ago, making a pause on new transfers prudent while impacts are studied.
- •They contend the bill protects the basin's long-term water security for residents, agriculture, and industry by ensuring transfers don't deplete local water supplies, and the $1.5 million study will provide scientific evidence to guide future water policy decisions.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the moratorium restricts economic development in other regions that need water resources and could delay projects waiting for approval.
- •They may also contend that the EMC's expanded authority to reduce existing transfers creates uncertainty for water utilities and industries that have already invested in infrastructure based on approved transfer agreements, potentially forcing costly operational changes.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.