Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
GSC Technical Corrections 2026
Primary Sponsor
Robert DavisRepublicanLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-06-11
Vote Breakdown
Plain Language Summary
This bill makes technical corrections to North Carolina state law by repealing obsolete language from past executive branch reorganizations (particularly from 1971 and 1973), reorganizing where certain statutes are located in the General Statutes, and making various other minor changes to improve clarity and accuracy in state law. The bill does not change the actual functions or powers of state agencies, but cleans up outdated references and reorganizes legal code.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill improves North Carolina's legal code by removing confusing language about reorganizations that occurred decades ago, making it easier for citizens and lawyers to understand current law.
- •By reorganizing and clarifying outdated provisions, the bill reduces potential legal confusion and makes state statutes more accessible and logically organized.
- •The General Statutes Commission recommended these technical corrections to keep state law current and coherent.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents might argue that large technical correction bills can be difficult to scrutinize thoroughly and could inadvertently affect how laws are interpreted or applied, even when that is not the intent.
- •Some may be concerned that reorganizing and removing historical language could potentially affect legal precedents or interpretations that relied on the previous statutory structure, though proponents would counter that the substantive law remains unchanged.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.