Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Secret Peeping on Minor/Increase Punishment
Primary Sponsor
Phillip ShepardRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Judiciary 2, if favorable, Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill increases criminal penalties for secret peeping offenses when the victim is a minor. Currently, many of these offenses are Class 1 misdemeanors or Class I felonies; the bill elevates them to Class A1 misdemeanors or Class H/G felonies when a minor is the victim. The bill also allocates $25,000 for a public awareness campaign about these laws.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue that children need stronger legal protection against voyeurism and sexual exploitation.
- •They contend that enhanced penalties appropriately reflect the serious harm caused to minor victims, deter predatory behavior, and align punishment with the severity of crimes against vulnerable children.
- •Proponents also support the public awareness campaign as a way to educate North Carolinians about these protections.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may express concerns about whether mandatory sentence enhancements are the most effective approach to preventing these crimes, and whether resources might be better directed toward prevention and victim support.
- •Some may question whether the penalty increases are proportionate or whether they could lead to unintended consequences in prosecution or sentencing discretion.
- •Others might debate whether the $25,000 public awareness allocation represents the best use of state funds.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.