Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Protecting Medicaid & Autism Services
Primary Sponsor
Garland PierceDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill appropriates $1.047 billion to update Medicaid funding to reflect current enrollment and costs, allows Medicaid health plans to create restricted provider networks specifically for research-based behavioral health treatment, and removes statutory rules that would automatically end Medicaid coverage for the expansion population under certain conditions.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue the funding rebase ensures Medicaid can adequately serve North Carolinians by accounting for real changes in enrollment and service costs, preventing gaps in care.
- •They contend that closed provider networks for behavioral health treatment improve quality and accountability by limiting providers to those using research-based methods.
- •They also argue that eliminating coverage discontinuation triggers provides stability and security for Medicaid expansion enrollees, protecting vulnerable populations from sudden loss of health insurance.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the substantial funding increase ($1.047 billion) strains the state budget and may not be sustainable long-term.
- •They could contend that closed provider networks limit patient choice and access by restricting which doctors and providers enrollees can see, potentially excluding qualified providers who use different treatment approaches.
- •Concerns exist that removing statutory coverage discontinuation triggers removes fiscal controls and may prevent necessary program adjustments based on budgetary constraints.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.