Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H1160Change ✕
Reduce Parent Copays/Child Care Subsidy/Funds
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Lindsey PratherDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill reduces the percentage of gross family income that parents must pay as copayments for subsidized child care from 10% to 7%, effective October 1, 2026. The bill appropriates $25 million in recurring state funds annually to cover the cost of this reduction.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill makes child care more affordable for working families, particularly lower-income households, which can help parents remain in the workforce and reduce financial hardship.
- •They contend that reducing copayments increases access to quality early education and child development services while supporting economic stability for families struggling with high child care costs.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the $25 million annual appropriation represents a significant ongoing state expenditure during a time of other budget priorities and fiscal constraints.
- •They may also question whether the copayment reduction is the most effective use of public funds compared to other approaches, or express concerns about the sustainability of recurring spending commitments.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.