Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S958Change ✕
Safe Parks Act
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Sophia ChitlikDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
The Safe Parks Act creates a new funding account to clean up environmental contamination at public parks caused by old landfills and hazardous sites. It increases the solid waste disposal tax from $2 to $4 per ton and redirects a portion of corporate income tax revenue to pay for park remediation, requiring local governments to match every $4 in state funds with $1 of local funding.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses environmental health hazards that make public parks unsafe or unusable for community recreation.
- •They contend that requiring local government matching funds ensures shared responsibility and prevents the state from bearing the entire cleanup cost, while the increased waste disposal tax creates a logical connection between those generating waste and funding remediation of contaminated sites.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that doubling the solid waste disposal tax increases costs for businesses and residents who dispose of waste, potentially raising prices for consumers and affecting waste management companies.
- •They may also contend that the local matching requirement burdens municipalities already facing tight budgets, and that dedicating corporate tax revenue to this program reduces funds available for other state priorities.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.