Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Increase Market Rate/Rate Floor/Child Subsidy
Primary Sponsor
Lindsey PratherDemocratLast Action
Ref to the Com on Appropriations, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill increases child care subsidy payment rates to the 75th percentile of the 2023 market rate study, with automatic increases whenever new studies are completed. It also establishes a statewide rate floor for child care providers in counties with rates below the state level. The bill appropriates $60 million from the General Fund, $20 million from the Child Care Block Grant, and $160 million from the General Fund to fund these increases, beginning July 1, 2026.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill addresses the child care affordability crisis by ensuring providers are paid rates that reflect actual market costs, which should improve provider retention and quality of care.
- •They contend that higher reimbursement rates make child care work more sustainable, reducing turnover and allowing more low-income families to access quality early education.
- •Automatic adjustments based on future studies ensure rates stay competitive without requiring repeated legislative action.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that the $240 million in annual recurring appropriations represent a significant state budget commitment during uncertain fiscal times, and question whether subsidizing providers at the 75th percentile is the most efficient use of limited resources.
- •Some may contend that the statewide rate floor could disadvantage rural or lower-cost-of-living counties, or express concerns about whether increased provider payments directly translate to improved access for low-income families or better outcomes for children.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.