Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Engrossed2026-06-24

Vote Breakdown

Plain Language Summary

This bill requires local governments to follow specific notification and public hearing procedures before adopting a property tax rate that exceeds the 'revenue-neutral rate' (the rate that would generate the same total revenue as the previous year despite property reappraisals) during reappraisal years. The bill also increases the late reinstatement fee for real estate appraiser trainees and clarifies that tax refunds can be issued when governments fail to follow these procedures.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this bill increases transparency and gives taxpayers meaningful notice and opportunity to be heard before tax increases occur during reappraisal years, when property values change.
• •They contend that without these requirements, taxpayers may experience unexpected tax increases simply due to rising property assessments rather than actual rate increases, and that the 'truth in taxation' procedures allow citizens to understand and challenge such increases before they take effect.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents argue this bill adds procedural requirements that could complicate local budget management and delay necessary tax rate adjustments, especially if revenues fall short of expectations mid-year.
• •They contend the additional notice and hearing requirements may increase administrative costs and complexity for local governments, and that the refund provision could create financial uncertainty and budgeting challenges if governments must repay taxes collected in error due to procedural mistakes.