Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Limit Electric Util. Hist. Fuel Cost Recovery
Primary Sponsor
Lindsey PratherDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill modifies how North Carolina's Utilities Commission handles electric utility fuel cost recovery by preventing utilities from recovering fuel costs incurred before a specified test period. It restores a limitation that bars utilities from charging customers for historical fuel costs outside the current review period, while allowing recovery of costs within a defined timeframe plus 30 days before the hearing.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects consumers from paying for old fuel costs that should have been addressed in previous rate cases, preventing utilities from indefinitely passing costs to customers.
- •They contend that limiting recovery to recent, relevant costs ensures rates reflect current conditions and prevents utilities from gaming the system by deferring cost recovery across multiple billing periods.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that preventing recovery of all historical fuel costs could leave utilities unable to recoup legitimate expenses, potentially affecting their financial stability and ability to invest in infrastructure.
- •They contend that some fuel cost adjustments spanning longer periods may be necessary and reasonable, and that restricting recovery mechanisms could ultimately harm service reliability or increase future rates to compensate.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.