Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
S1012Change ✕
Ban Online For-Profit Charters
IntroducedSenate
Primary Sponsor
Sophia ChitlikDemocratLast Action
Ref To Com On Rules and Operations of the Senate2026-05-04
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill prohibits North Carolina charter schools from using for-profit management companies, requires online charter students to take state tests in person with a social worker present, limits online charter renewals to one year instead of five years, mandates yearly financial audits for online charters, and prevents low-performing online charters from renewing.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill protects students and taxpayer money by preventing for-profit companies from profiting off charter schools.
- •They contend that requiring in-person testing ensures academic integrity, that shorter renewal terms allow better oversight of struggling programs, and that separate financial reporting increases transparency.
- •Supporters also point out that online charters serve fewer students and have lower graduation rates compared to traditional public schools, making stricter accountability necessary.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents argue this bill may discourage online charter schools that serve families needing flexible education options, such as students with health issues, working students, or those in rural areas.
- •They contend that one-year renewals create instability for schools trying to plan long-term and may increase administrative costs.
- •Critics also suggest that requiring in-person testing defeats the purpose of online education for families choosing remote learning, and that the bill's requirements may be costly to implement without sufficient funding.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.