Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
Reenact Funding/Meck. Emerg. Pension Fund
Primary Sponsor
Patricia CothamRepublicanLast Action
Ref to the Com on Pensions and Retirement, if favorable, Finance, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-05-06
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill restores and increases funding for the Emergency Pension Fund for sworn law enforcement officers in Mecklenburg County by raising a court fee collected in criminal cases. The fee charged at conviction or guilty plea increases from $1.00 to $2.00 in most criminal cases, with the collected money going to support the pension fund. The change takes effect October 1, 2026.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill provides necessary funding for law enforcement officer pensions and benefits in Mecklenburg County, which had been depleted or eliminated.
- •The modest $1 increase per criminal case conviction is a reasonable way to generate revenue for this purpose without requiring general tax increases.
- •This dedicated fee ensures officers have reliable pension support.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue that increasing court fees adds costs to the criminal justice system that fall on defendants and potentially burden low-income individuals involved in the court system.
- •Some may question whether this is the most appropriate funding mechanism or whether the pension fund should be supported through other county budget processes.
- •There are also questions about whether the fund's original repeal had sound reasons that should be reconsidered.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.