Compare Bills

Primary Sponsor

Last Action

Ref To Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-06-03

Vote Breakdown

No floor votes recorded.

Plain Language Summary

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would require North Carolina Supreme Court Justices to recuse themselves from cases where they have financial interests, personal relationships with parties involved, or previously sponsored the law being challenged. It would also require Justices to publicly disclose large financial transactions ($10,000+), non-salary income, and who funds their travel.

Arguments in Favor

• •Supporters argue this amendment increases transparency and prevents conflicts of interest on the state's highest court.
• •They contend that requiring Justices to recuse themselves in cases involving their financial interests or close relationships protects the integrity of the judicial system and public confidence in court decisions.
• •Disclosure requirements would allow North Carolinians to know about potential influences on their Justices' decisions.

Arguments Against

• •Opponents may argue that the recusal requirements could make it difficult to seat a full court in some cases, potentially delaying justice.
• •Some might contend that the financial disclosure thresholds ($10,000) are arbitrary and that extensive disclosure requirements could discourage qualified candidates from seeking judicial office.
• •Others may question whether these restrictions are necessary given existing ethics rules and judicial conduct standards.