Compare Bills
Put two bills side by side — summaries, sponsors, arguments, and votes.
H1214Change ✕
Make E-Verify Great Again
IntroducedHouse
Primary Sponsor
Ben MossRepublicanLast Action
Re-ref Com On Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House2026-06-10
Vote Breakdown
No floor votes recorded.
Plain Language Summary
This bill requires state and local government employers to use the federal E-Verify system to confirm employee work authorization. It creates a 30-day cure period for first-time violations, allows the Department of Labor to conduct random compliance checks, increases civil penalties for repeated violations, and protects employees who report E-Verify violations from retaliation.
Arguments in Favor
- •Supporters argue this bill strengthens workplace compliance with federal immigration law by ensuring all public employers verify work authorization.
- •They contend it protects jobs for authorized workers, creates accountability through enforcement mechanisms and random audits, and includes a good-faith safe harbor provision that shields employers from penalties when they act reasonably but receive fraudulent documents.
- •The cure period gives employers a fair chance to correct violations before facing penalties.
Arguments Against
- •Opponents may argue the bill increases regulatory burden and administrative costs on already-stretched public budgets, particularly for small municipalities and counties.
- •They may express concerns about the random compliance checks creating compliance uncertainty, view the significantly increased civil penalties (up to $25,000 for repeat violations) as potentially excessive, and question whether the federal E-Verify system is reliable enough to warrant mandatory use, given documented error rates and delays in the system.
Second Bill
Search for a bill to compare
Select a bill in each panel to see them compared side by side.